(Begin ZetaTalk on Hale-Bopp)
[ZetaTalk dated August, 1995]
The Hale-Bopp comet does not
exist. It is a fraud, perpetrated by
those who would have the teeming
masses quiescent until it is too late.
Hale-Bopp is nothing more
than a distant star, and will draw no
closer. Such is the choice
for this fraud that its characteristics
cannot be affirmatively proven
until some time has passed. Is it a
distant exploding star?
Can't say. Is it moving, can't say for sure.
Is it drawing nigh? Can't
say. All is speculation. It has the same
appearance as the 12th Planet
at the current time - a blurry glowing
orb that seems to stand still.
But Hale-Bopp is not even coming from
the same direction as the 12th
Planet. How has the elliptical path of
Hale-Bopp been calculated, such
that it simulates the elliptical path
ascribed to the 12th Planet?
How was the periodic nature of Hale-Bopp
calculated to be close to the
periodic nature of the 12th Planet? How
coincidental, and the results
published and seared into the memory of
the populace before the data
can be examined or questioned.
Science such as this would not
make it into scientific journals, but
has made the press, and this
is not by accident. The press was
directed to do so. The
perpetrators, the establishment and wealthy,
are on the top of the heap at
present and do not wish the heap to start
moving about under them.
They would have the rest of mankind become
aware of the 12th Planet's approach
only when it is too late to react.
They, however, have already
reacted. As time passes, just as with the
Roswell autopsy tapes, the foundation
of these claims will be eroded.
By 1996 or 1997, the supposed
arrival time of Hale-Bopp, the truth will
be well known. What will
not be well known is that the real danger is
still on its way. The
12th Planet, a true messenger of death, will not
even get the attention the fraudulent
Hale-Bopp is getting today.
That's because it's a real threat,
not a diversion. Don't look to
Sagittarius, look to the left
of Betelgeuse in late 2001, and keep
looking!
If the newspapers print it, then
it must be so. But the newspapers are
only printing what the bureaucrats
have put forth. If NASA gives it
space and puts the name comet
to it, it must be so. But NASA itself is
only summarizing what individual
contributors have said. NASA has
boldly posted other people's
comments about the exploding star that is
called comet Hale-Bopp, but
NASA itself is not commenting. Why so shy?
This normally conservative
organization, which does not even list a
body as an official comet unless
it has been observed, tracked, and
made a cycle within the last
75 or so years, is giving center stage to
a body that has never formerly
been seen and has no track record. NASA
itself avoids mentioning the
Hale-Bopp orbit, as to do so would require
confirming the false 1993 image
of Hale-Bopp by an Australian
observatory, an image that will
be discovered, in due time, to be
incorrect. It is this
sighting and this sighting alone that an orbit
is based on. NASA was
not willing to sully its reputation by
falsifying its 1993 image capture.
Thus, no mention of the orbit.
Why has Hale-Bopp, at this time,
decided to fragment and explode,
growing in brightness?
This is decidedly not the pattern that comets
present, but it is the pattern
of exploding stars, super novas, which
become for a brief time visible,
and then wink out. The path of
Hale-Bopp was supposed to pass
between the Earth and the Sun, in a
similar manner to the true path
of the 12th Planet, and now is
announced to have a turn-around
closer to Mars. Just so will the tale
of the supposed comet change
over time.
Mark our words. We, ZetaTalk,
are telling you that the announcement
will be made that Hale-Bopp has
utterly fragmented, long before
its trumpeted arrival date. Why so?
How else to explain an exploding
star that winked out. How convenient
for the perpetrators of the
falsehood. What's next? Oh, that the 12th
Planet, when eventually sighted,
is no more real or dangerous than this
clever fraud.
Hale-Bopp was pronounced a comet
when it does not, truly, meet the
requirements for a comet.
Do not the bureaucrats who assign numbers
and name the celestial body
after the finder check on these matters?
No! They have a minimum
requirement, three points, and if these line
up into what can be computed
as a reasonable orbit - all is well and
all is accepted. What
this means is that three people, working in
collusion, can produce a fraud.
In fact, since the proofs, the three
points, can come from a single
source, it only takes one person to
produce a fraud. Without
the 1993 image the recorded orbit of
Hale-Bopp is so many pin-points
on the head of a pin. They are all in
the same place. The diffuse
brightness of an exploding star provides a
fairly large area of bright
points, as the mass of the star spirals
outward with fiercely burning
portions away from the star center, which
is dimming. Just which
of those little pin points is considered the
so-called comet head?
No one can say, as the so-called comet head has
not been located without the
coma usually presented. This blur or tha
t is called a faint coma at
times, and no tail has been found, so the
artists who would draw an orbit
for Hale-Bopp are given a free hand.
What about Hale-Bopp marks it
as a comet? On appearance it is an
exploding star - appearing suddenly
and increasing rapidly in
brightness, diffuse in appearance
rather than with the coma expected of
a comet, and having no tail
to speak of. There are several
irregularities that should have
prevented Hale-Bopp from being labeled
comet so breezily by the bureaucrats
so cooperatively looking the other
way.
· First, where it has
been noted that Hale-Bopp should have shown up on
a 1991 image as well as the
famous 1993 image, if it were a comet, this
has been explained away as an
outburst at the current time. Outbursts
occur when comets fragment on
nearing the Sun, being of a composition
that cannot withstand the exposure.
· Second, the outburst
story stands directly at odds with the orbital
computation, which places Hale-Bopp,
so the story goes, in a regular
orbit around the Sun every 4,000
years or so!
· Third, the triangulation
required is in fact not a triangulation at
all, in the case of Hale-Bopp,
as in truth only the current position
and the falsified 1993 image
are being used as the base. Are there not
nightly movements in the placement
of Hale-Bopp? As an exploding star
increases in size and brightness,
then dims and fades, the area where
these points can be placed is
relatively large and, in fact, at the
current time, moving outward
at the edges.
· Fourth, no one is challenging
how these points are determined. Are
they the supposed comet's head?
As no one has located a comet head in
the diffuse brightness, those
who position points across the face of
Hale-Bopp have been given a
free hand.
Pick the orbit you want, calculate
back in time and alter a single
image accordingly, pepper a
few hundred points across the diffuse
brightness of an exploding star
- and voile, you have a comet!
(End ZetaTalk)
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@aol.com
http://www.zetatalk.com/zetatalk/