|
Sign up for a free web hosting account at 741.com |
What about Comets being "perturbed"?
Many point to studies of comet
orbits as evidence of Planet X. Two
scientists who are studying
this are John B. Murray and John J. Matese.
They are studying the orbits
of long period comets to attempt to detect
if there is “a perturber" in
the far outer solar system influencing the
orbits of these comets.
Murray is purposing an object
30,000 AU from the sun. Matese
purposes 25,000 AU. They purpose
an orbit of 4 to 6 million years
for their object. The Zeta Planet
X is supposed to be 360 AU and
the Zeta Nemesis is supposed
to be 720 AU. These theories are used
as evidence of the Zeta Planet
X, yet their conclusions are totally
different than the Zeta Planet
X. This doesn't seem to bother the
Planet X crowd, especially since
Murray and Matese are some of
the few astronomers still proposing
Planet X.
It is typical of Planet X supporters
to reference the news stories on
anything related to Planet X,
such as Murray and Matese, and ignore
the actual facts of the articles
to justify their fantasy planet. It is not
a particularly honest approach
in validating their planet, but why let a
few facts get in the way?