This argument always comes
up when science shows how silly the Planet X
2003 theories really are.
Some supporters are shocked when they first
hear that Planet X must break
all our understanding of gravity and motion!
New followers often start out
with the idea that this is simply a planet that
NASA is hiding. When they discover
the zany truth that it is actually
impossible, they begin to talk
about "official science" and how science
discovers new things all the
time. Newton's laws of gravity and motion
probably don't apply to Planet
X. After all, Einstein proved Newton wrong,
didn't he?
The real answer is, NO Einstein
did not "break" Newton's Law of
Universal Gravitation, he explained
a very slight differences in the orbit
of Mercury. This was a new theory
called the Theory of General Relativity.
The differences between Planet
X 2003 and the laws of physics are huge,
often by a factor of 100X or
more. Science is not infallible, we learn and
redefine our understanding of
the world around us frequently. The issue
here is that to believe these
silly theories, you must believe Planet X will
shatter all our understanding
of science with it's warp speed acceleration,
it slowing as it reaches the
sun and it's perfect return to the sun's dead
twin. (which doesn't exist either)
Nice attempt at explaining the
difference between PX and modern physics.
Better than just blaming the
old conspiracy.
See encyclopedia.com