|
|
In late May 2002 Mark Hazlewood
came up with a new "sighting" of
Planet X.
___________________________________
I just spoke with a triple Doctorate that thanked me for writing my
book. He said if it wasn't for me he would have not found out about
Planet X. This past Thursday 5-23-02 right outside of Boston he went
to the Museum of Science. They had a large scope with filters. There
were 24 people there including several government officials. He
personally had a look at 2001 KX76 and Planet X. He was told not to
tell anyone this but because of my efforts he phoned my son down in
Florida first and told him that he saw Planet X. I phoned my son and
asked for my messages and then he told me a Doctor called and said he
saw PX personally. I said to him "How does it feel getting first hand
information before me, I usually get it first?" My 22 year old son
was not impressed, he'd heard it all before and didn't understand the
significance of this sighting I believe.
I then phoned the Doctor back from up here in Toronto and had a 12
minute conversation with him before he had to take a patient. He said
right away that he saw Planet X and it is 100% confirmed. He ended
the phone call saying 100% confirmed twice. He said the government is
very worried about what PX will do when it passes. They said to him
that last time PX passed the majority of the objects from the
asteroid belt cratered the moon and went into our oceans. That this
was the time (every 3600 years during PX's passing) when most of the
cratering gets formed on our moon. The additional worry was that some
of these asteroid type objects might get deflected this time and
would not land in the ocean. He said the whole meeting was very hush
hush.
He said they said at it's present speed that it would arrive in 3.5
years but said that could be disinformation and may not take into
account that it could be increasing in speed. [From my understanding
PX is increasing in speed exponentially and there's nothing but basic
Newtonian physics that is causing this and nothing preventing it from
reaching ANY speed and will be here between early June to early July
2003.]
He said also that he heard from the group there that Hubble is being
used to monitor this situation with PX very closely and an
observatory in Killoway (spelling) Hawaii. [I'm sure there's alot
more scopes viewing this] Also, the point was made that THEY know
it's inbound and are very worried about what it will do when it
passes because of its size. He said it could be very devastating.
____________________________________________
This is obviously a fake report
by a very desperate Hazlewood in an
attempt to increase interest
in Planet X. Why is it so obviously fake?
1. On May 23, 2002 the given
coordinates for Planet X were very close
to the sun and not visible.
2. The Boston Museum of Science
is a leaning center and the largest
telescope there is a modest
12 inch instrument, which many amateurs
also have.
When Hazlewood heard about the
mistake he had made his story changed
to "non-traditional" viewing.
As more questions came in the story
changed to a computer link to
the Hubble Space Telescope. Unfortunately
for Hazlewood the Hubble cannot
view objects close to the sun. Oops!
So this "100% confirmed sighting"
as Hazlewood called it changed from
a "large telescope with filters"
to "non traditional viewing" to a computer
link to Hubble.
This is probably why Nancy Lieder
wanted nothing to do with Hazlewood,
he is not smart enough to tell
a good lie!
____________________________________________________________________
There were supposedly 3 sightings
of Planet X in 2001. They have been
called "documented", "confirmed"
and "verified" sightings. These
sightings are extremely doubtful
and apparently many believers in
Planet X 2003 don't believe
in these sightings either. There are several
good reasons.
At Lowell the telescope used
was a 16 inch telescope used for public
viewing. No filter was used
and the observatory staffer supposedly
agreed that it was a magnitude
11 object.
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/sight005.htm
At Vancouver, a 19 inch telescope
was used, again with no red
filter. PX was supposedly seen
easily.
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/sight008.htm
In both cases, people without
any experience with telescopes using
moderate sized instruments simply
looked and there it was. These were
very nice instruments, although
not the huge observatory telescopes
we read about and see pictures
of.
The problem is that there are
many thousands of amateurs who could
see what were seen at these
2 sightings. There are many amateurs with
smaller scopes with CCD cameras
that could image beyond what could
be seen visually with these
scopes. Nothing has been seen by amateurs,
and the Zetans now say that
nothing but an observatory scope can
see it until mid 2002. The object
was confirmed as an 11th magnitude
object, something that could
be seen with a small telescope. Either these
were not true sightings or a
few hundred thousand amateurs worldwide
should be able to see it.
The Zeta position on Planet X
viewing
http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90280.htm
The 3rd sighting was at Neuchatel.
This was reported by someone with
tt-france that "the daughter
of the astronomer reports that they
suspect a comet or a brown dwarf".
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/sight002.htm
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/sight003.htm
Oddly it turns out that Neuchatel
no longer does professional observations.
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/sight004.htm
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=7492
Neuchatel is now open for amateur
use only. The french message also states
that the object was found near
the arm of Orion. The Zeta
Map shows Planet
X to be in Taurus in early 2001.
Quite a stretch to call these "documented", "confirmed or "verified".